Recently, there has been a significant increase in representation of women in clinical trials (NIH, June 2003), including the Womens Health Initiative. These trials have yielded vast findings with high clinical relevance to women (Cauley, et al., 2003; Hays, et al., 2003; Manson, et al., 2003).
Health services research has also shown that although women seek more(prenominal) medical care, use more health care services, and spend more on medications than men (Roe, McNamara, & Motheral, 2002), inequalities in care lock up limit womens access to definite diagnostic procedures and therapies proven to be effective for specific conditions (Weisman, 1999; Bierman & Clancy, 2001; Grady, Chaput, & Kristof, 2003). Much, therefore, still needs to be done to improve access, receipt, and quality of care for this priority population.
The healthcare community (e.g., practitioners, researchers, policymakers, trainees) may have several(predicate) backgrounds and work under diverse incentives, but their work complements from each one other and ultimately, they all share the same common destruction of improving quality of care for women. The dialogue among group members should endure to:
...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment