Prisoners are Prone to HIV/AIDS

The ruling was the result of a law suit by 150 infected prisoners seeking to overturn the segregation policy. They won a elflike victory in that the Court ordered further investigation as to whether these prisoners had been denied equal access to prison educational and recreational programs and effective assistance.

The advantage of mass screenings for acquired immune deficiency syndrome and segregation of HIV collateral prisoners is that prisoners be often in close contact, and a quite a little of homosexual activity takes place in prisons where the men are deprived of female companionship for extended periods of time. Fights also bunk protrude, and the exchange of blood and body fluids could occur. This could make the disease give rapidly through the prison population and put legion(predicate) prisoners at risk. Therefore, segregation is seen as a way to nurture the prisoners who do non have the disease.

Integrating the help controlling prisoners is also a problem for the guards because of the many fights that break out and the need to subdue prisoners at times. Guards could easily come in contact with blood and other body fluids when breaking up a fight between prisoners, and could become infected in this way. Prisoners have been love to spit at guards and the guards come in contact with prisoners' body fluids so there is risk to them from AIDS convinced(p) prisoners. In a mixed population, the guards may not know which prisoners are AIDS positive and which ones are not, so they cannot take adequate precautions.

hypertext transfer protocol://www.workers.org/2005/us/alabama-0818

The above statistics show that although the rate of confirmed AIDS infection in the prison population is more than than 3 times as high as that in the popular population, the overall rate is very low. This is despite the fact that the prison populations are now all integrated. A policy of non-segregation is of more help than harm to both the prisoners and the staff. Fear of stigmatization, loss of confidentiality and variety deter prisoners from being tested, and the threat of segregation will further aggravate this situation (Lines, 1997).

If a prisoner is segregated in one prison then released, and is imprisoned again for most reason, the staff of the new prison would know his record and know he had been segregated as being HIV positive at the previous prison, so his confidentiality would have been breached, and he may be stigmatized and discriminated against.

Reports are exaggerated and untruths get perpetuated until everyone believes them. The media hypes the stories with misleading pictures and headlines aimed at grabbing the reader's attention.

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9DOCE4DF103EF

2. The statistics on HIV and AIDS incidence for prisoners in 2003, the latest figures available, shows that the images are surprisingly small (Bureau, 2005). Between 2002 and 2003, the number of HIV positive prisoners declined by 1 per centum even though the prison population change magnitude 1.6 percent. At the end of 2003, 2.8 percent of female State prisoners and 1.9 percent of male State prisoners were HIV positive. During 2003, 282 prisoners died from AIDS-related causes, 268 from State prisons and 14 from national prisons. In 2003, there was a total of 23,659 prisoners in the US who were HIV positive (HIV, 2005). The majority were clustered in a few states, New York, Florida and Texas accounting for half that number. The total number of prisoners with outright AIDS was 5,227, 4601 in St
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!