The Legalization of the Same Sex Marriage in Massachusetts

A primitive amendment to permission same-sex marriage has several clear and distinct purposes. First, marital condition will give same-sex partners the same rights as married heterosexuals. These rights take: tax obligations and benefits, rights of inheritance, social security and health insurance or pension benefits, custody of nonbiological children, hospital visitation and termination of feel support, and court appointment of guardianship for a partner who is ment wholey incompetent (Gourvitz & Gourvitz, 2002). Addition eachy, from a sociological perspective, same-sex marriage would do overmuch to remove any lingering stigma attached to same-sex partnerships. It could sustain in reducing bias, prejudice and discrimination directed against brave and lesbian individuals living in partnerships. A same-sex marriage constitutional amendment would also have the added effect of stopping the courts from redefining marriage in any way that they see fit, though not all analysts see this effect as positive (Bork, 2004).

An implicit goal of a constitutional amendment permitting same-sex marriage is to accord greater governmental status to same-sex partners. Duncan (2004) also noted that by passing a constitutional amendment into law, society benefits from eliminating conflicting produce laws that leave same-sex partners in doubt and uncertainty as to their legal; status. While in Massachusetts, for example, a same-sex couple may be recognized as legally married an

SJC-08860. useable at www.mass.gov/courts/courtsand

This is an opinion shared not plainly by President George W. Bush, but also by Robert Bork (2004), imperative court of law Justice White, and others in and out of government. According to Bork (2004), there is no basis in the U.S. Constitution for extending due process rights to same-sex couples. peradventure more significantly, same-sex marriage is seen by Bork (2004) to further opening the limen to variations on marriage - group marriage, incestuous marriage, adult-child marriage, and so forth. Nevertheless, the U.S.

Supreme Court has consistently moved to eliminate any and all laws that criminalize sexual contact between members of the same sex, belongings for example, Texas' gay sodomy law unconstitutional in the human face of Lawrence v. Texas (Weiser, 2004).

Bork, R.H. (2004). The necessary amendment. First Things: A

friendly forum for gay marriage. newfound Jersey Law Journal,

A number of voices have been raised against same sex marriage. In May 2002, six U.S. Congressmen introduced the national Marriage Amendment in the U.S. House of Representatives which proclaims that for the purposes of federal law, marriage applies only to male-female couples. According to Duncan (2004), this act does not prevent any state from willfully instituting or recognizing same-sex marriage. Nevertheless, Duncan (2004) maintains that well over 50 pct of the American public agree that marriage should be delineate as limited to a man and a charwoman and not as inclusive of same-sex marriages.

Arguments For and Against The Policy

Coolidge, D.O. & Duncan, W.C. (2001). Reaffirming marriage:

The debate over same sex marriage often incorporates appeals to religious whimsy and value systems (Coolidge & Duncan, 2001). President George W. Bush has firmly stated that he unilaterally opposes any definition of legal marriage that goes beyond that involving a male and a female. Members of both moderate and fundamentalist religiou
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!