In the expression “Here’s to your health” by Joan Dunayer her need of strong, apt arguments is a key factor that works against her. Coupled with her drop of evidential quotations and one too many “Slippery heel over” assumptions, the strength of her argument on societies acceptance of alcohol, media’s irritation of it, and the influence it has on people is greatly impacted in a negative way that hinders it’s significance. More so when taken into consideration that her argument is a relatively technical one.
Throughout the argument Dunayer shares a rather extensive harken of supposedly “factual entropy.” The only problem with such data is that it is presented as though it were common sense, in the sense that in that respect are no sources given. That said, her statements, as logically sound as they may be, are weakened by her lack of sources which would other strengthen the impact of her statements. Of course this is fine when addressing a specialized audience, an already informed audience, but it does not have ofttimes sway with an otherwise oblivious one. For example, Dunayer writes, “By the age of 21, the fair American has seen drinking on TV about 75 000 times.
” and “Like all alcohol, it lowers the levels of male hormones in men and of young-bearing(prenominal) hormones in women - even when taken in small amounts.” both of these arguments may in fact be true, however she gives no credibility and leaves the assumption for one to think that she’s stating her aver knowledge as a credible source to only her argument.
Moreover, falling in league with the prior point, Dunayer’s lack of credibility leads to a weakened argument on her behalf. As aforementioned, though she does share knowledge in the article that does appear reasonable to assume, it’s validity from a credible source isn’t mentioned. Thus, it does not solidify the statement or...If you want to make grow a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment