In todays society, the question has arisen of homoism being a choice or being pre-programmed into the body. This inquiry is often known as the genius vs. lift debate. Generally speaking, these two conflicting perspectives fall into exist political categories. The nature prospect, which typically falls within the course of study of liberals, is the belief that homosexuality is catchingally predetermined. This besides happens to be the base that psychologists and mental health professionals tend to side with. The opposing belief, the nurture prospect, is generally viewed as a more conservative viewpoint. This belief, which suggests that homosexuality occurs due to ones atmosphere and upbringing, is most often supported by sociologists. Contrary to the beliefs of many members of society, which is that homosexuality is a function of transmissible code, homosexuality is a result of both previous or existing surroundings and personal choice.
Homosexuality is not a result of genetics. No one is born homosexual and at that place is no scientific data to substantiate a genetic or biological basis for same-sex attractions (Sheldon). Homosexuality is not an indistinguishability; it is a behavior. in that locationfore, anyone can choose to change and become straight. The purpose of born gay has no factual basis (Sheldon). There argon numbers of men that realize that they have homosexual tendencies well into their heterosexual marriages.
For those that assume homosexuality is purely genetic, I would pose the question: does it make sense that someone would genetically be homosexual yet not realize it until they are well into a heterosexual relationship? The answer is understandably no because if the answer were to be yes, then that person would sooner be attracted to members of the same sex. Aside from that, there are also many homosexuals that return to their heterosexual lifestyle. Some people may have participated in homosexual activities but later...
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper