In my opinion, I consider Elizabeth I a more tyrannic leader. This can be seen by means of her actions involving religion, succession, Spain, and finances. Elizabeth demonstrated her authoritarian leaders via religion. When Elizabeth I came to throne in England, the country was divided in its religious beliefs. The two main religion groups were the Catholics and Protestants. In perspective of the fact that both parties were strong, a religious war was most(prenominal) probable to occur if Elizabeth supported one religion and not the other. If this civil war so to speak broke out, Elizabeth would fall asleep government agency and control. Since, she wanted the support of both parties, Elizabeth established a state church to satisfy the religious and assign her power over all her subjects.
        Also, Elizabeth I displayed her totalitarian leadership through succession. Mary Stuart, Queen of Scots, was a strong Catholic. Moreover, she possessed both the active support of the pope and the rulers of Spain. Also, the devout Catholics of England hoped that Mary would fit the queen of England. Mary Stuart tried to gain control of the side of meat throne. However, despite the support of those prominent leaders, Mary faced a revolt from the Scots, who were converting to other denominations of Christianity, especially Presbyterian.
Mary fled to England for protection, but it was told that she lighten sought the throne. Seeing as Elizabeth I might discharge her control of England, if Marys actions were pursued and she obtained the support and help from the English citizens, Elizabeth I ordered the beheading of Mary, Queen of Scots, her opponent, who may have obtained the throne, if not for her premature death. Elizabeths ordered execution of Mary Stuart shows her desire to maintain complete control of England by not letting anyone sustain an obstacle or hinder her from this...
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment