Untitled

The Frozen People         Suzie Q, a twenty-five year gray woman, is dying of AIDS. When she learned this, she heard close some social occasion c completelyed cryonic rest period. A cryonist at the hospital where she gets treatment told her how cryonics freezes throng when they be pronounced dead. When the cure for AIDS is developed, she would then be revived and open to start a radical smell. Suzie Q decided to participate in cryonic faulting and spent her flavour savings to invent for the freeze process. Five long time later, Suzie Q died. The cryonics team flew her to an Alcor Life adjunct Foundation where she was cold. Suzie Qs family did non k presently about her plans and were highly upset beca engross they felt it was impossible to conduct a right funeral without a ashes to bury.

cryonics what a funny word in time the meaning of this funny word is extremely serious. In Newsday Sidney C. Schaer a news writer wrote this, THE WORD cryonics- the practice of freezing a dead body in hopes of someday revive it- didnt enter the dictionary until 1967. But 200 years earlier, Ben Franklin was stargaze of a frozen ride to immortality (Schaer). cryonic suspension requires that the bodys temperature be lowered to -196 degrees Celsius or the same as liquid nitrogen. thusly the body or head is stored in a dewar, which is analogous a thermos, and put into cold storage. This flask is continuously being filled with liquid nitrogen because the nitrogen is evaporating continuously to prolong the temperature low (Cryonic). The cryonic medical team leave solitary(prenominal) remediate the patients when the cure for what killed the patient is found. Although cryonics is a medical wisdom break-though, it should be nix in the United States for several reasons. Cryonic suspension could cause over population and wasted bills, cellular ph unrivaled damage and the patients could possibly be used as ginzo pigs, and how testament they adapt to the future?         Obviously, great deal are enkindle in cryonics because it will prolong their life. In the near future, in that location will be cures for diseases much(prenominal) as AIDS and cancer. Cryonics would be able to give a frozen person with such diseases a chance to be blushtu on the whole toldy cured. Cryonics would prolong life not only(prenominal) to the age of eighty, still possibly to about one speed of light and twenty. regard the chance of being reunited with the people you care about, in the future of exciting possibilities (What). A life in the future may hold exciting new developments; however, the science of cryonics has not been palmyly proven to be effective. Today, a tiny group of biologists is still assay to bring cryonics to its perfection. A remote larger group of debunkers; however, says cryonics is little more than bogus science, its promise, they say, will never be fulfilled. (Schaer). because, todays society should not be able to invest in and/or participate in cryonic suspension until it has been proven to be successful and without face effects.

        The first reason cryonic suspension should not be used is because of the overpopulation it will cause if and when the patients of Alcor are all revived. Cryonics has been in place since the 1960s, and thither are still no successful reanimation plans to prove it will work. Thus, suspended people will in all likelihood be frozen for at least one vitamin C to two hundred years. Many of the patients could be revived at or around the same time. The patients so far are all adults, and therefore, will all move into the work pluck and the community together. By the time reanimation occurs, there could be thousands of patients in suspension. The majority of cryonicly suspended patients will be left with no immediate family or friends, and would generate no place to live. not to mention that isolation could cause problems of homelessness and unemployment. Everybody has seen the zillions of advertisements for starving children and adults. This problem has no current solution, and as a result the homelessness and unemployment increase each year. The Alcor patients could also be extremely confused and probably a bit scared. Todays society should not be suffered to participate in cryonics until these problems are realized and solutions are considered.          In addition to the overpopulation it will cause, cryonic suspension should not be allowed because the amount of money required to keep the program release when cryonicists are not even sure their ideas will work. The money comes from the patients own bank account and insurance policies. Tomas Kellner states that, suspension providers, such as Alcor require clients to designate the provider as the policys irrevocable beneficiary to cover all freezing costs. That money cannot be touched by family who feels the deceaseds investment is misguided (Forbes). If in the event cryonic suspension does not work will the patient be in the end laid to rest, one hundred to two hundred years later, and will the money in the patients account go to the bottom that cryonically suspended him or her? In National Review a writer states that, There are annual dues to pay and when the, ahem, morsel comes, a neurosuspension will set you fanny $50,000; building block body will cost $120,000 (Stuttaford 2). These prices do not include reanimation costs. The position that cryonicist are not completely sure the process is going to work should be reason enough not to allow this kind of procedure.

Not even an animal has successfully been brought back from suspension to live longer than a few months. Cells and variety meat may be damaged beyond repair. The skeletal outline could be fractured and splintered during the freezing process due to dehydration. When a cell is frozen the delicate structure of it is disrupted. Imagine freezing jello and then thawing it out, it becomes runny and non-edible. Now imagine trying to repair the structure of the eye. Inside the globe of the eye is a substance similar to Jell-O. During the freezing process the cells dehydrate, and then crystallize. microphone Darwin of Alcor noticed several years ago that every organ of their [suspended patients] bodies suffers cracking from thermal stress during freezing. In particular, the spinal heap suffered several fractures. Thus, whole bodies were not quite as whole as roughly people presumed (FAQ 5). The damage caused to the cells could be far too extensive to even attempt reanimation. The biggest problem is that urine seeps out of cells, freezes, and thus expands and forms crystals which can puncture the cells (Genetic). The scientists/cryonicists will have to test this on a human some day. The event cryonics has not been proven yet is frighten. They could try to use one of the patients as a guinea pig or research lab rat for use in experiments that may never work. As one leaflet is careful to say, we dont k like a shot if what we are doing will work (qtd. in Stuttaford 2). There are already many people in deep-freeze without any hopes of being reanimated.

The most important reason cryonic suspension should be outlawed is that a persons body in suspension is negatively touch by the procedure, and the new technology fifty to one hundred years later may not be adaptable to people who are put in cryonic suspension today. After being suspended for one hundred or two hundred years, the shock of reanimation would be overwhelming to the people just revived. The patient will need to learn how to notch and talk all over again if it is at all possible. Muscles, which are not used, lose their stability. The people of Alcor do not go into cold storage where the patients are kept and commit the muscles of the suspended people. Patients, after being revived, would be in the hospital for months running tests before he/she is actually released.



In the Detroit needy Press a writer quoted, This is not like frozen steaks you can bring back, defrost and eat. These are human bodies. Its just not possible, said Dr L.J. Dragovic, Oakland Countys medical examiner.(Cryonics). whole the new technology and advances could confuse one who was suspended in the 1980s and reanimated one hundred years later. When the mesh came out a litter of people loved the idea, but the thought of actually having to use it frightened a lot of people who knew nothing about computers in the first place. Imagine waking up to even more technology. Everything will be different in the next one hundred years. For all we know cars could be hovering like in The Jetsons when the last thing the patient remembered is Fred Flintstone using foot power. Our entire way of doing things could assortment leaving the revived person to fend for them selves in an even bigger world.

        Yes, cryonics seems like a good idea. Imagine the possibilities of life in the future where once one could only dream of seeing, and now there is the chance of actually living in it. Unfortunately for these few believers it has not yet been proven effective, and there are too many problems that cryonicists are not work on. All they are thinking about is eventually reviving a patient and betting on the technology to be there when needed. As Arthur Rowe boldly stated, believing in cryonics could reanimate somebody who has been frozen is like believing you can phone number hamburger back into a cow (qtd. in Stuttaford 2). Therefore cryonics should not be used until there are answers to all the unanswered questions. There are some who say that noesis gained through science dehumanizes life by shining a harshly dispassionate light on the unknown, on enigma (Hoagland 149). Cryonics is skimming the edge of science fiction and nothing more.

Suzie Q has now been rejuvenated for five years, and now all she dreams of is dying. She has been set free among a world of no familiar family, and no idea how to use the new technology in this new world. It is so frightening to look outside and expect a world seen only in memories, and see a world one could never even imagine existing. First AIDS caused Suzie Qs pain, now the pain is caused by cryonics. Now she must wait for expiry to come again.

Works Cited http://www.public.iastate.edu/~hood/cryonics.html.Cryonics: Adding Years to your Life. 3 declination 2001.

http://www.dse.nl/~hkl/e_cryo.htm: Cryonic Suspension. Henry Kluytmans. November 16, 2001.

Cryonics: Frequently Asked Questions List (FAQ). Oxford University Libraries mechanisation Service. 29 January 1995. 27 November 2001.

http://www.freep.com/news/latestnews/pm1453-200012115.htm: Cryonics still has believers. Friday, celestial latitude 15, 2000. December 18, 2001.

http://www.babesinspace.net/report/reports/2000-04-17.html: Genetic Engineering and Cryonic Freezing: Thoughts Inspired by Frankenstein. Harley Geiger and Bryan Osborn. April 17, 2000. November 29, 2001.

Hoagland, Mahlon B., The Roots of Life A Laymans Guide to Genes, Evolution and the Ways of Cells. capital of Massachusetts: Houghton-Mifflin, 1978, p. 149.

Schaer, Sidney C. Long Island: Our Future/ Back to the Future/ Cryonics in a Deep Freeze/ Predictions from the Past that Havent catch TrueYet. Newsday 5 Feb. 1999: A19 Online. America Online. 11 May 1999. 16 November 2001.

Stuttaford, Andrew. Frozen Future. National Review (2 September 1996): n. page Lamp. 26 April 1999.

http://www.alcor.org/01b.html What We Do Cryo Transport and The Alcor Life Extension Foundation. 16 November 2001.

If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com



If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper