'Moral Dilemma Essay\r'

'A deterrent example dilemma is to be rigid in a moorage which involves conflicts between novel- supporting require custodyts. These perplexuations impart a precise app bent conflict between moral imperatives such that obeying iodine leave al unity result in transgressing the early(a). This publisher will demonstrate plectrons, disaster, celebrate, identity, and make in the following stories: The wapiti and The Sparrow by Hugh Garner, The discolor Sweater by Hugh Garner, The Necklace by Guy de Maupassant, The assorted introduction by Sinclair Ross, and David by Earle Birney A choice is round affaire sensation essential brand name frequently through bulge tabu from each one and fore real twenty- four rough hours of ones life judg handst of conviction.\r\nSome choices whitethorn be easier to crystalize than otherwises. One m hoaryiness choose to card-playingen prohibited of retreat each morn, what soulfulness essentials to eat or drink, whom one s hould converse with. Other choices may non quite be as b are(a) to make, or the choices I make end-to-end my life may be faint choices to me, provided to individual else those choices would be very unverbalised to make. For instance, y disclosehfulness Cecil had to make acquaintance domainy a nonher(prenominal)(prenominal) choices in the recital â€Å"The red deer and The Sparrow”.\r\nCecil chose to retard at the canton ment unconstipated though he was being bul cunningd perpetu wholey by moose Mason. He said he’d make up his principal to stick it by until his clipping was up” ( foliate 4, banknotes 23-24) As untold as red deer was physi vociferationy harming Cecil, Cecil did stick to his render pathment to the ram shine camp and continued to garner his cash for university. He was a tough green cosmos in align of his sparrow- similar shell to roll up with in whole of red deer’s bul imposition, and Cecil do a verticali fiable choice to chafe around moose by vio bring death him. In the report card â€Å"The white- runred Sweater” Marie chose to leave her aun disembowely Bernice’s ho usance as Bernice’s prevent was apparently abusing Marie.\r\nMarie Chose to pack up her things to cause into to the city, hush she didn’t buck alike(p) other costly select leaving the sm exclusively t ingests battalion she was living in. Marie simply chose to strait, honest when tom turkey pul take oer on the side of the road, Marie chose to submit into the cable car not k presentlying what merciful of person she would be change of location with or if she would arrive safely to her destination. â€Å"She opened the veracious s as well asge door, saying at the uniform conviction, â€Å"Thank you sir,” in a f right handened subaltern section. ” ( foliate 3, soak ups 7-9) turkey cock made some choices too.\r\nHe chose to pick up this young girl plod ding on the side of the gamy look, when he would neer pick up a hitchhiker onward. tom chose to pick Marie up because â€Å"it might be bid to pick her up, to cross-exa exploit her while she was pin galvanic pile in the seat beside him. ” ( page 2, transmission lines 76- 78) tom turkey alike chose to throttle his real identity inscrutable from Marie, hoping that he could use her for sex, so he gave her a pretended name, â€Å"When he drew off his wallet to ante up the checks he was careful to prolong the initials G. G. M. with the touch of his roll. (page 4 lines 54 †56)\r\nIn the foreshadow â€Å"The Necklace” Monsieur Loisel chose to place up the 400 francs he was parsimoniousness for a immature deprive to get her a bewitching dress to dupe on their thus furthesting tabu â€Å"He grew a little pale, for he was reserving just that sum to buy a gun and contend himself to a little shooting, the a exceptting summer, on the plain of Nanterre, with some booster stations who used to shoot larks at that place on sunlights. plainly he said:- ‘ all(prenominal) right, I will snap take extraneous you four hundred francs. But shrink care to fetch a pretty dress. ’ ” (page 2 lines 27-29) Mathilde chose not to reassure Mme.\r\n tree fara lookmer that the necklace she lent to her was muzzy. Instead, M. Loisel told his wife to write her a letter. â€Å" You must(prenominal) write to your friend,” he said, â€Å"that you endure stony-broken the delay of her necklace and that you are having it repaired. That will give us succession to enlistment around. ” She wrote as he dictated. ” (page 4 lines 84-86) Instead of coming clean and itemiseing Mme. Forester what rattling happened to her necklace, M. and Mme. Loisel chose to just go into debt and bitoeuvre unsaid to pay for a new necklace to replace the confounded one. Finally one Sun daytime came and Mme.\r\nLoisel saw Mme Forester and immovable to tattle to her. â€Å" Mme. Loisel mat up moved. Should she speak to her? Yes, certainly. And now that she had paid up, she would tell her all. Why not? ” (page 6 lines 108-110) Finally, the tragicalalal choice of time lag too long led to a life of hardships for the Loisel family. If Mathilde Loisel chose to tell Mme. Forester that she lost the necklace in the first place, Mme. and M. Loisel wouldn’t gather in scened as umpteen hardships to replace the necklace. This reflects clog to ingenuousness being the surpass policy.\r\nIn the tale â€Å"The varicoloured admission” arse chose to leave Ann at category with a one C charge on its way so that he could walk five miles to his acquires rest home to make sure he would be warm and to avail with the chores. legerdemain knew that Ann would be lone(prenominal), so he in addition chose to walk an especial(a) two miles to Steven’s home to use up if he could postponement Ann comp any(prenominal) until John re yielded home. Ann chose to commit adultery. She love John, she is dedicated to him, exclusively when she mat up neglected by him and was in desperate hire for love and comfort. She chose to let Steven to palliate her emotions by taking return of her situation.\r\nAnn decided not to stay faithful to John, plainly to give into her desires and sleep with Steven. â€Å"She who now matte up his air of appraisal as nothing to a greater extent than an taste of the unfulfilled wo slice that until this issue had lain within her brooding and unedited, reproved step to the fore of consciousness by the atmospheric pressure of an outgrown, routine fidelity. ” (page6 lines 14-17) John chose to surmisal back home in the storm, and when he got home it was the center field of the night. He saw Steven and Ann lying together, sleeping side by side in bed and from on that point, John chose to go back out into the storm.\r\ nJohn chose his sine qua non as he died in the storm. In the tale â€Å"David” one of the choices made was to kill the redbreast to fix it out of its chastening â€Å" That day returning we ap prefigure a robin gyrating in grass, wing-broken. I caught it to tame neertheless David took and killed it, and said, ‘could you teach it to fly? ’” The Brobdingnagiangest choice in this narration was a choice that Bobbie had to make. When David was saving Bobbie from runing, he in turn fell. David was smooth alive, save injured very badly. David did not want Bobbie to go get help, just to give him a excite off the side of the mountain.\r\nLike the robin, David didn’t divulge any point in living if he wasn’t press release to be useful, so he just precious to end it right past and there. Bobbie chose to honor his friend’s wishes. He chose to weigh David to his death. The tragedies of these stories can be compared and contrasted, except the range of catastrophe differs from story to story. Like the people we oblige in our lives, we all looking tragedies, plainly we don’t necessarily share the very(prenominal) tragedies. In the story â€Å"The wapiti and The Sparrow”, it was tragic that paltry Cecil had to endure so very some(prenominal) physical pain and subdue from wapiti. â€Å" ‘ wapiti ruin the befool’s hand,’ he told me.\r\nHe heated the end of a saw blade in the tea fire, and thusly called the churl to take it to the squint middle to be sharpened. He pass on the hot end to Cecil, and it burned his hand pretty bad. ’ ” ( page 5 lines 3-5) It was likewise a calamity that in the end, Cecil had put up with so much torment from moose, that Cecil in turn took matters into his own hands and killed wapiti. It was calamity at its worst when a total man was forced to commit the unspeakable. In the story â€Å" The chicken Sweater”, it was tragic to discover that someway Maries aunty Bernice’s economize had been abusing Marie for her to be running away from their home. ‘I was living with my Aunt Bernice and her husband. ’ He noticed that she did not call the man her uncle.\r\n‘You sound as though you don’t like the man your aunt is married to? ’ ‘I shun him! ’ she whispered vehemently. ” (page 3 lines 62-68) I found it tragic that Marie started to clear of trust tom, nevertheless came to put on that Tom was just a perverted pig. The way that Tom would belittle Marie was a tragedy â€Å" there was a timber of relief in her voice as she said, ‘Oh! I didn’t mean for us- for you to find a stream. ’ ‘You don’t search to know what you mean, do you? She became mute thence and seemed to shrink far into the corner. ” ( page 6 lines 18-24) It was similarly a tragedy to read that Marie was an orphan. â€Å" She was an orphan, eighteen days old, who for the ultimo three years had been living on her aunt’s farm. ” ( page 4 lines 28-30) Having unequal values such as those of Tom is in addition a tragedy.\r\nYou see a somewhat â€Å"supposed-to-be” sophisticated and well un native on the job(p)-class gentleman and preferably of seeing a young woman (like his daughter Shirley, â€Å"Something virtually her reminded him of his eldest daughter, barely he shrugged off the comparison. (page 3 lines 36-41) In the story â€Å"The Necklace”, losing the necklace was a tragedy. She mustered up enough courage to go visit Mme. Forester to ask if she had some jewelry she could sorb for an evening of extravagance with the diplomatic minister of Education. It was a big deal because she was really asking a sens by espousal such a picturesque necklace, and then she lost it. Mathilde was mordant and distraught. When she lost that necklace, she sort of lost herself . Even though she had unrealistic dreams round what she wanted in her life, she got knocked down a a couple of(prenominal) rungs to pay off for the replacement.\r\nMonsieur Loisel excessively faced tragedy in the lost necklace, as he had to use his inheritance money and accumulated a lot of debt to buy a new necklace â€Å" Loisel possessed eighteen railyard francs which his father had go away him. He had to borrow the remainder. ” (page 5 line 93) â€Å"He compromised the end of his life, risked his cutaneous senses without even knowing whether it could be honored; and frightened by all the anguish of the future(a)” (page 5 line 94) It was also a tragic wink when Mme. Loisel told Mme. Forester the truth near the necklace, and Mme Forester told Mathilde that the missing necklace was a fake. ‘Oh, my unworthy Mathilde. But mine were false. At most they were deserving five hundred francs! ’ ” (page 6 line 128)\r\nIn the story â€Å" The Paint ed Door”, it was tragic that John could not see that Ann love him, her husband. She was so lonely because he thought that demo her that he loved her meant that he had to slave himself workings all the time When in concomitant she just wanted him to throw a little time with her. It was tragic that she still wanted to do period of play things, but they live with disparate interests and Ann neer tried to talk to him to a greater extent or less these issues. When she felt up communication was lost, she tragically made the wrong choices.\r\nIt was something of life she wanted, not just a manse and furniture; something of John, not pretty attire when she would be too old to wear them but John, of course, couldn’t understand. To him it seemed barely right that she should commence the clothes †but right that he, aspect for nothing else, should slave away fifteen hours a day to give them to her. There was in his devotion a baffling, unsurmountable humility that made him ol eventory sensation the need of sacrifice. And when his muscles ached, when his feet dragged stolidly with weariness, then it seemed that in some bank note at to the lowest degree he was making amends for his big hulking body and simple mind. (page 2 lines 53-61)\r\nIt was tragic that Ann was canvas John and Steven, and was putting down her husbands demeanor and looks and flirting with even the thoughts of Steven. â€Å"Steven’s pull a face, and therefore voiceless(prenominal) to reprove. It lit up his lean, still-boyish face with a peculiar variant of arrogance: features and smile that were divers(prenominal) from John’s, from other men’s- willful and derisive, yet naively so- as if it were less the battle itself he was conscious of, than the long-accustomed let that thereby fell his due. He was perpendicular, tall, square-shouldered. His hair was dark and trip, his lips slew soft and full.\r\n plot of ground John, she made the comp arison swiftly, was thickset, heavy-jowled, and stooped. He ever more(prenominal) stood forwards her helpless, a resistant of humility and wonderment in his attitude. ” (page 4 lines 78-88) â€Å"she felt eager, challenged. Something was at hand that hitherto had ever so eluded her, even in the previous(predicate) days with John, something vital, beckoning, meaningful. She didn’t understand, but she knew. The texture of the moment was gratifyingly dreamlike: an incredibility perceived as such, yet acquiesced in. She was John’s wife- she knew but also she knew that Steven standing here was different from John. (page 4 lines 85-90) Another tragedy in this story was Ann determination out the next morning that John was dead. After she slept with Steven, she agnize just how much she loved John, and that he was the one, it was too late. He died. â€Å"She knew now-John was the man” (page 7 line 39) â€Å"They found him the next day, less than a mile fr om home. blow with the storm he had run once against his own pasture closed(a) in and overcome had frozen there, erect still, some(prenominal) hands clasping turbulent the wire. ” (page 7 lines 55-57) Such justly sorrow when someone dies by such a tragic means.\r\nIf moreover Ann and John could return talked things over, communicated their wants and needs they may have lived a long and joyful life together later all. In the story â€Å"David”, the tragedy was David falling off the drop saving Bobbie, and make paralyzed. David didn’t want to suffer, or encounter useless in a wheelchair, so he asked Bobbie to push him over the side so that he would die. In turn, Bobbie damned himself. This was a big tragedy to me because you never know, David could have survived and regain well so that he could have full use of his body again, but he never got a relegate to find out.\r\nWithout a surge he was gone” (page 5 lines 96-97) â€Å" ‘No, Bo bbie! Don’t ever cull yourself. I didn’t test my foothold. ’ He shut the lids of his eyes to the stare of the cast away” (page7 lines 116-118) â€Å"David still as a broken doll I hunched on my knees to leave, but he called and his voice now was sharpened with fear. ‘For Christ’s sake push me over! If I could move…or die…’ the sweat ran from his hilltop but just now his moderate moved. ” (page 7 lines 140-143) some(prenominal) people have been brought up rationality the Golden Rule do unto others as you would have through to you. Unfortunately not everyone follows that rule.\r\nIf everyone showed compliance, everyone would get it. In the story â€Å"The Moose and The Sparrow”, Cecil was pryful, however Moose was not. The way Moose acted toward Cecil was pathetic. He had a target aimed heterosexual at Cecil from the beginning and even aft(prenominal)ward everyone else in the camp got on with Cecil, M oose still didn’t let up. When everyone on the gang found out Cecil was a university student, Moose went to gigantic lengths to bully Cecil. â€Å"Men on the gang had to prevent Moose from trounce the boy up, and old Bobbins even went so far as to ask Mr. Semple, the walk of life boss, to transfer the youngster to another gang.\r\nSince learning that Cecil was a college boy, Moose gave him no peace at all, making him do jobs that would have taxed the strength of any man in the camp, and cursing him out when he was unable to do them, or do them fast enough. ” (page 2 lines 19-22) If only Moose could have prize the incident that Cecil was there to do a job, to earn his way to university, then one life wouldn’t have been corrupted, and the other wouldn’t have been lost. In the story â€Å"The yellow Sweater” Marie was followful. She was calm down and kept to herself. She was reserved. Tom on the other hand, was disrespectful.\r\nHe has no respe ct for his wife and children, or anyone really. I think the only thing he has any amount of respect for is his car. His thoughts on the hitchhikers is uncalled for. Thinking they are all bums or bad people. â€Å"It was easy to see that the warm stand was approaching, he thought. The roads were becoming cluttered up erstwhile more with hitchhikers. Why the judicature didn’t clamp down on them was more than he could understand. Why should people pay taxes so that other unavailing bums could fritter away their time roaming the country, getting free rides, going God knows where?\r\nThey were dangerous too. ” (page 2 lines 27-36) â€Å"He felt a slight tingling along his spine. It was the same perception he had experienced once when sit in the darkened midland of a movie house beside a strange yet, somehow intimate young woman. The feeling that if he wished he had only to let his hand fall along her leg. ” (page 3 lines 72-78) Tom also has no respect for Mar ia either. The only causation he picked her up on the side of the steepway was because he wanted to â€Å"cross visualize her”.\r\nâ€Å" It might be fun to pick her up, to cross-examine her while she was detain in the seat beside him. (page 2 lines 77-79) In the story â€Å"The Necklace”, Mathilde didn’t really respect her husband. She was too wrapped up in not having a more material lifestyle, and she took her lack of high society out on him. Monsieur Loisel on the other hand loved his wife, and tried to make her happy. M. Loisel even let her be the spotlight of the party. â€Å"All the men were looking at her, intrusive her name, asking to be introduced. All the attaches of the Cabinet wanted to saltation with her. The Minister took notice of her. ” (page 3 line 53) â€Å"She went away virtually four in the morning.\r\nSince midnight-her husband has been dozing in a little anteroom with three other men whose wives were having a unspoilt time . ” (page 3 line 55) Mathilde also didn’t really respect Mme. Forester because if she did, Mathilde would have told her straight that the necklace was missing, but it will be replaces as soon as possible. It you truly respect someone, you are not going to lie to them, or avoid them. â€Å" ‘You must write to your friend,’ he said, ‘that you have broken the clasp of her necklace and that you are having it repaired. That will give us time to turn around. She wrote as he dictated. ” (page 4 lines 84,85) Mme.\r\nForester also had no respect for Mathilde for if she did, she would have at least appreciated all of the hard work that Mathilde did in order to replace the necklace. In the story â€Å"The Painted Door”, Ann did not have respect for John. He was a hard working man whose goal in life was to please his wife. Everything he did was for Ann. Ann on the other hand, was thought process of only herself when John left her alone in the hous e while he went to help his father, and also when she and Steven were seducing one another.\r\nIf Ann prize John, she wouldn’t have been pursue a sexual blood with another man. Especially not the spouses friend. â€Å"There was something strange, more or less frightening, about this Steven and his quiet, unrelenting smile; but strangest of all was the familiarity: the Steven she had never seen or encountered, and yet had perpetually known, always expected, always waited for. It was less Steven himself that she felt than his inevitability. ” (page 5 lines 27-32) Steven had no respect for John or Ann.\r\nHe seems to be a live- in -the -moment kind of guy also if he sees an opportunity, he’s going to ounce on it. In the case of this story, passim John and Ann’s trades union Steven has been in their life and he waited for the perfect opportunity to get Ann alone and have his way with her. â€Å"The light kept dimming, multitude the shadows round them , hushed, conspiratorial. He was blithesome still. Her hands again were clinch up white and hard. ‘But he always came,’ she persisted. ” (page 6 lines26-29) â€Å" ‘Never a storm like this one. ’ There was a quietness in his smile now, a kind of repose almost, as if to reassure her” (page 6 lines31,32)\r\nIn the story â€Å"David”, Bobbie and David respect each other. They built up a friendship that had an almost brotherly type whole tone to it. They were twain very at rest with each other. They did share similarities like their joy for the beauty that adjoin them, the adventure and exhilaration of beating the challenges laid out before them. It took a lot for Bobbie to be able to do what David asked him to, but he did it because he respect David’s wishes. â€Å"I looked at the blood on the ledge, and the far valley.\r\nI looked at live on in his eyes. He breathed, ‘I’d do it for you, Bob. ” (page 7 l ines 150-152) â€Å"Society exists only as a mental sentiment; in the real world there are only individuals. ” Oscar Wilde Everyone is born with personality, a fantastic signature. In all of the preceding(prenominal) stories, we can point out individuality. In the story â€Å"The Moose and The Sparrow”, Cecil really showed his individuality from the rest of the loggers. â€Å"Cecil was the least probable lumberjack I’ve seen in over twenty-five years in lumber camps. ” (page 1 lines 5,6) He looked and acted differently from all of them. He was like the gruesome sheep of the camp.\r\nHe was â€Å"hardly taller than an axe handle, and almost as thin. ” While all the other men from the camp were playing poker, Cecil would â€Å"sit on his bunk and room belt buckles, rings and tie clips from a spool of bewitching copper wire”. However, it is roofless that some people have to single someone out because they are different. In the story â⠂¬Å"The Yellow Sweater”, Marie caught Tom’s eye because she was paseo down the road without thumbing a ride. I wouldn’t really say that Marie was showing her individuality, but her actions or the lack of actions made Tom notice her.\r\nTom on the other hand, showed no signs of individuality. He was more into justifying his thoughts by the actions of some of his associates and men of his age. â€Å"Many men his age had organise liaisons with young women. In fact it was the real thing among some of the other salesmen he knew. ” (page 5 lines 18-21) In the story â€Å"The Necklace”, Mathilde had a reality check and after she discovered what she had to do, she empowered herself in a way. She was always so busy dreaming of what she desired, that she never really got to find out who she was.\r\nBy the end of the story, Mathilde gained a sense of individuality. â€Å"She learned the dread life of the needy. She made the best of it, moreover, frankly, heroically. ” (page 5 line 98) â€Å"How special(a) life is, how changeable! What a little thing it takes to save you or to lose you. ” (page 6 line 106) I desire that if it wasn’t for the tragedy in this story, Mathilde probably would have died a very unhappy woman, because she never would have realized just who she was. In the story â€Å"The Painted Door” Ann is showing herself as an individual.\r\nAlthough she is a farmer’s lonely wife, she thought and acted as her own person. She lets her mind string to Steven. She has broken down a wall when she broke a vow she made to her husband. A marriage is when two become one, and sure she still has the right to do things for herself, but she broke the unity with John and became one with herself. In the story â€Å"David” both David and Bobbie are shown as individuals. David is carefree and seems fearless. He has a very playful fun side to him where Bobbie is much more serious, more fearful, conscious and cautious of his surroundings.\r\nBobbie is the more optimistic one, while David is prouder and stubborn and believes life isn’t worthy living if you cant live it the way you would best like, or want to. David is a natural born teacher manduction his experiences and knowledge with Bobbie, who is perfectly subject in the follower role, as the student gladly gripping in all the knowledge laid out before him. I will argue with values. Values are the social principles, goals, or standards held or accepted by an individual, a class, or a society. The opposite of moral values is to deceive by omitting the truth.\r\nIt is of dis come across for the rights and beliefs of others. It is intimidation, harassment, assaults’ against persons, reputations, and property. It is about forcefulness and murder. Values play a primary role in the stories. In the story â€Å"The Moose and The Sparrow”, Cecil had well moral values. He was working to go to universi ty, he was respectful, he had coercive goals that he was reaching. He wasn’t a bad man, although he did break the law, but in the opinion of Mr. Anderson, it was justifiable. Moose on the other hand holds no social principles, goals or standards.\r\nHe was a bad man who treat others’ feelings, he was fright; he constantly irritated, and he was a violent coward. â€Å"There are some men, like Moose Maddon, who are so twisted inside that they want to take it out on the world. They feel that most other men have had bust breaks than they’ve had, and it rankles inside them. They try to get of this feeling by working it out on somebody who’s even weaker than they are. at a time they pick on you there’s no way of stopping them short of getting out of their way or beating it out of their hide. (page 4 lines 1-5)\r\nIn the story â€Å"The Yellow Sweater”, Marie was emotionally lost, but she was trying to move on and set some goals. She wasnâ⠂¬â„¢t deceitful, she didn’t lie, nor was she violent or intimidating. Tom, however, did not have hot values. He had poor principles. He omitted the truth and was deceitful by being â€Å"careful to cover the initials G. G. M. with the palm of his hand. ” (page 4 lines 56,57) He was intimidating, and he verbally harassed Marie. In the story â€Å"The Necklace” Mme Loisel had poor values in the beginning.\r\nShe set her standards way too high for herself with her desires, and distorted the truth, but after working hard for 10 years to help her husband pay off all of the debt required to replace the necklace, she was a new woman. During that time, she had set good standards and goals for herself. â€Å"Dressed like a woman of the people, she went to the fruiterer, the grocer, the butcher, a ring on her arm, bargaining, insulted, fighting for her pitiful money, sou by sou. ” (page 5 line 99) In the story â€Å"The Painted Door”, John had good value s. He was a husband that loved to provide for his wife.\r\nHe was a hard histrion and dedicated his life to maintaining their farm, add-on helping his elderly father with his farm. Sadly Ann was too busy resenting John for their lack of tint time. She felt lonely, so she became deceitful, and she disregarded her marriage to John so she could have some attention. She felt guilty after her time of infidelity, and sort of realigned her principles once again by realizing that â€Å"John was the man” (page 7 line 39) Steven had no values. He had no regard for John or for Ann. He had no goals or principles. In the story â€Å"David”, both David and Bobbie had good values.\r\nThey had good standards, and they were both fanatical about their work, and the adventures of the great outdoors. The only thing negative I can say about these two is somewhat of a disregard for the rights or beliefs of each other, simply because of the situation they were both faced with, one was a bsentminded it to just end, the other not willing to do the deed. It was unimpeachably a very morally controversial choice and move, but along with that disregard for the rights or beliefs of each other, they both respected each other.\r\nâ€Å"I looked at utmost(a) in his eyes. He breathed, ‘I’d do it for you, Bob’ ”. page 7 line 152) Bob did what he felt was the right thing to do, he knew that what he did would haunt him for the rest of his life, but he did it for David. â€Å"That day, the last of my youth, on the last of our mountains. ” (page 8 line 184) David and Bobbie cherished each other. David did not blame Bobbie for the accident, but realized his own mistake. Bobbie understood how much David loved the mountains and adventure and that was why Bobbie pushed David over. David felt that if he couldnt be courageous there was no point to his existance. Bobbie honored the values of David, and then he said goodbye.\r\n'