Moult Hall Essay

This report was licenced by the committee of the North West consecrateingness for the Protection of Wildlife to analyses the financial statements of two hear ends for the Trust.The First statement is a projection improvement statement for running a quad bike activity core group by Winston Barkwith.The Second and Third statement argon a proportion of Johnathans and Ingrids proposal without or with local Authority funding.FindingsWinstons proposal does non appear to be in the best interests of the Trust in relation to its three of import aims.Questions dwell to be answered around the source of Revenue for Winstons proposal.Johnathan and Ingrids proposal with the prospect of Local Authority funding and is deeply in the best interests of the Trust. marvel 1 (A)This do nigh(a) statement included the capital costs to set up the project as Winston leave alone be proposing this to the Trust and the give would fill to be made awargon of the on the whole costs including set up costs.We are non told who will finance the set-up costs, we are non told if they will be financed by capital or if they will be compensable for by the trust and for that reason they are included in the profit statement.QUESTION 1 (B)QUESTION 1 (C)IS THE ESTIMATED COST OF THE device assure REASONABLE IN similarity TO THE COST OF SIMILAR PROJECTS?The committee would pack further information regarding the proposals to fall in a decision. If they could compare the projects to similar ones they could feed a more accurate decision. It whitethorn be easy to achieve a decision based on Jonathan and Ingrids proposal as Jonathan and Ingrid may be able to obtain copies of financial reports from Johnstone House which would make for easy comparison. There is nothing that we are told of to compare Winstons proposal with.WHERE IS THE PROJECT PROPOSAL FINANCE COMING FROM?Winston has not declared where the finance will come from to finance his project. The committee would need to evalu ate where he is getting his finance from for his proposal. If Winstons plan failed they may be left wing with no income. The project needs to be financially sustainable.DOES THE PROJECT PROPOSAL FULFIL POLICIES AND AIMS?The committee will need to assess whether or not the Winstons proposal fit in with the aims of the Trust. At a busy glance we can see that Johnathan and Ingrids proposal seems to fit clean well with the main goals of the Trust and would benefit the local community greatly and not endanger the existing plant and wildlife. However looking at Winstons proposal it seems to benefit an exclusive rich club and not the wider community and also there may be a ban impact of the existing plant and wildlife because of the noise and air pollution and removal of intrinsic habitats.THE BACKGROUND OF THE PROJECT PROPOSERS.The Trust would need to evaluate what is the want behind both of the project proposals. The fact that Winston will retain all surplus income himself sh ould be alarming to the Trust as it would not be reinvested into the trust. Winstons primary aim seems to be a profit for himself. Whereas Johnathan and Ingrid who are on the committee longer seem to constitute a project based on the true aims of the trust and that is the benefit of the community and the environment.QUESTION 3.DISCUSS THE FINANCIAL AND NON-FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS OF WINSTONS PROPOSAL AND ITS POSSIBLE CONSEQUENCES IN RELATION TO THE TRUST FULFILLING ITS STATED AIMS.FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONSThe Trust will now retain a regular fixed income of 750000.00 per year. This could be beneficial as they may rent more time to concentrate on the aims of the trust kinda of spending a lot of time fundraising.The Trust has recently hired two mod-fashioned staff to co-ordinate fund-raising activities, it is unclear now whether or not they will still be needed for fundraising activities, they may have to be let go.The upkeep and maintenance of the bed board and the hall reception r ooms will be funded for by Winstons proposal, thats a good thing as it wouldnt have to come out of fundraising activities.The trust may even stand to gain more from the rich clients who are coming to stay may even financially support the trust there may be new opportunities of holding banquet events where all their fundraising could be done in one or two nights end-to-end the year .There is no mention of where Winstons set up costs come from we are not told if they are financed or nonrecreational for and will the trust be expected to fund these?The Surplus coin from Winstons project is going to him it is not being re-invested in the Trust.NON-FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONSWinstons proposal does not fit in with the three aims of the trustThe natural habitat of the Kites and other wildlife maybe destroyed as a new track will be built and existing trees will be cut down.The petrol pollution from the Quads may kill the small rodents which is the main food source for red kites.The local resi dents and community will not benefit from the local countryside. Health and safety laws would have to be considered if it was to remain open to the public.Winstons proposal does not facilitate the education of the regions youngish people.The local residents and community may be unhappy if they hear what they have lost through Winstons proposal. They may even protest against the felling of trees and new tracks been made.It could attract a lot of unwanted attention for Winston from the media. Eco warriors could take up residence in the woodland. Winstons Rich clients may not bid the unwanted attention and they may not even come to stay.